Vicissitudes of Mexico’s competitiveness vis-à-vis trading partners: The United States, China, Canada and Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32870/mycp.v13i38.884Keywords:
competitiveness, competitive advantages, transactional costs, neo-institutuional, productivityAbstract
This article aims to carry out a medium-term comparative analysis that allows us to know the evolution and sources of competitiveness of Mexico and its main trading partners: The United States, China, and Canada, which occupy the first, second, and third place, respectively. The analysis includes Brazil as the leading economy in Latin America. Our country benefits from the high trade surplus with partners of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. These benefits contrast with the large deficit with China and other Asian economies. One of the keys to this problem links the country’s competitiveness and industrialization model. In this regard, documentary research is presented according to the systemic-neo-institutional approach that takes up the World Economic Forum of Davos and the World Bank studies. The results reveal a divergence between the WEF’s assessments, which point to a favorable evolution of Mexico’s global competitiveness, and the World Bank, which detects a deterioration in the conditions for doing business with allies to institutional regulatory norms. The analysis ranks Mexico’s competitive advantages and the weaknesses or failures that balk them in the 2011-2019 period.Downloads
References
Banco Mundial (s.f.). El Grupo Banco Mundial y el Fondo Monetario Internacional (FMI). https://www.bancomundial.org/es/about/history/the-world-bank-group-and-the-imf
Banco Mundial (2013). Doing Business 2013. Regulaciones inteligentes para las pequeñas y medianas empresas. Banco Internacional de Reconstrucción y Fomento; Banco Mundial. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/397841468148163255/pdf/Regulaciones-inteligentes-para-las-peque%C3%B1as-y-medianas-empresas-resumen-ejecutivo.pdf
Banco Mundial (2019, octubre 24). Informe Doing Business 2020: mantener el ritmo de las reformas para mejorar el clima de negocios. https://www.bancomundial.org/es/news/feature/2019/10/24/doing-business-2020-sustaining-the-pace-of-reforms
Banco Mundial (2020). Metodología. https://archive.doingbusiness.org/es/methodology
Banco Mundial (2021, septiembre 16). El Grupo Banco Mundial dejará de publicar el Informe Doing Business. https://www.bancomundial.org/es/news/statement/2021/09/16/world-bank-group-to-discontinue-doing-business-report
Esser, K., Hillebrand, W., Messner, D., & Meyer-Stamer, J. (1996). Competitividad sistémica: nuevo desafío para las empresas y la política. Revista de la Cepal, 59(1), 39-52.
Expansión/Datosmacro (2019a). Canadá –Índice de Competitividad Global. https://datosmacro.expansion.com/estado/indice-competitividad-global/canada
Expansión/Datosmacro (2019b). China –Índice de Competitividad Global. https://datosmacro.expansion.com/estado/indice-competitividad-global/china
Expansión/Datosmacro (2019c). Estados Unidos –Índice de Competitividad Global. https://datosmacro.expansion.com/estado/indice-competitividad-global/usa
Expansión/Datosmacro (2019d). México – Doing Business: Facilidad para hacer negocios. https://datosmacro.expansion.com/negocios/doing-business/mexico
Expansión/Datosmacro (2019e). México – Índice de Competitividad Global. https://datosmacro.expansion.com/estado/indice-competitividad-global/mexico
Expansión/Datosmacro (2022, noviembre 20). Comparar países México-Brasil, China, EU, Canadá. https://datosmacro.expansion.com/paises/comparar/mexico/brasil?sector=pib+anual+a+precios+de+mercado&sc=XE16#tbl
Expansión/Datosmacro (2024). Comparar países: México vs Estados Unidos. https://datosmacro.expansion.com/paises/comparar/mexico/usa
Guillén, H. (2005). México frente a la mundialización neoliberal. Era.
Hodgson, G. M. (2007). Economía institucional y evolutiva contemporánea. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
Krugman, P. (1994). Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession. ForeignAffairs, 73(4), 28-44. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/1994-03-01/competitiveness-dangerous-obsession
Porter, M. E. (2007). La ventaja competitiva de las naciones. Harvard Business Review, 85(11), 69-95.
Schwab, K., & World Economic Forum (2015). The Global Competitiveness Report 2015-2016. World Economic Forum. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/gcr/2015-2016/Global_Competitiveness_Report_2015-2016.pdf
Schwab, K., & World Economic Forum (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report 2019. World Economic Forum. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdf
Schwab, K., Zahidi, S., & World Economic Forum (2020). The Global Competitiveness Report 2020. How Countries are Performing onthe Road to Recovery. World Economic Forum. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2020.pdf
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2021). World Investment Report 2021: Investing in Sustainable Recovery. United Nations. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2021_en.pdf
World Bank Group (2019). Doing Business 2020: Training for Reform. Compairing Business Regulationfor Domestic Firms in 190 Economies. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development; The World Bank. https://archive.doingbusiness.org/content/dam/doingBusiness/media/Annual-Reports/English/DB2019-report_web-version.pdf
World Bank Group (2020). Doing Business 2020: Comparing Business Regulation in 190 Economies. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development; The World Bank. https://archive.doingbusiness.org/es/doingbusiness
World Economic Forum (s.f.). Índice Global de Competitividad. https://www.competitividad.org.do/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Reporte-Global-de-Competitividad-14-15.pdf
World Economic Forum (2022). Annual Report 2021-2022. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Annual_Report_2021_22.pdf
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2024-04-19 (2)
- 2024-04-19 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 México y la Cuenca del Pacífico
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Open Access Policy
This journal provides open access to all its contents, in adherence to the principle that making research freely available supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
MyCP is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license, also known as CC BY-NC.
Contents are published in both PDF and XML formats.
Authors who publish in México y la Cuenca del Pacífico must accept the following conditions:
Pursuant to Mexican copyright laws, México y la Cuenca del Pacífico acknowledges and respects the authors’ moral right and ownership of property rights, which will be assigned to the University of Guadalajara to publish the articles in an open-access mode.
México y la Cuenca del Pacífico does not charge the authors any fees for receiving and processing their articles.
Authors are permitted to enter into other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article version published in México y la Cuenca del Pacífico (for example, publishing it in an institutional repository or in other printed or electronic media) as long as they clearly state that the piece was originally published in México y la Cuenca del Pacífico.
Pursuant to the above, once the article is approved for publication, authors must send the Assignment of Rights Agreement form duly filled and signed. This form must be sent to mexicoylacuenca@gmail.com as a PDF file.
Readers/users of México y la Cuenca del Pacífico can freely access the journal new issues as soon as they are uploaded. Readers/users are allowed to cite, share (both electronically and physically), print and distribute the material, provided they expressly state that the work was originally published in México y la Cuenca del Pacífico. Contents are to be properly cited and never for commercial purposes.
