The New Political-economic conjuncture in the Pacific Region: Two Expressions of Protectionism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32870/mycp.v8i22.592

Abstract

The Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) and President Donald Trump's decree to impose quotas and raise tariffs on US steel and aluminum imports are expressions of protectionism: one results from the rules of the CPTPP and the other one derives from the progressive deterioration of the American economy as the engine of the global system. The objectives of this paper are: to place the opposition between the Trump administration and the signatories of the CPTPP in the current international economic context; to analyze the main lines of the American protectionism; to study the economic and political relevance of the CPTPP. For now, the opposition "nationalist protectionism vs regulated liberalization" modifies political conditions at the global, Pacific and North American scales. In the global level, the World Trade Organization (WTO) has been relegated to a secondary place, by the preference of the signatories of the CPTPP for regional stipulations on the OMC global regulations and due to the flagrant violations of these global regulations contained in the Korea-FTA. U.S. In the Pacific, the political impact of the CPTPP will be experienced in APEC; Sino-American competition for leadership tends to be replaced by the Sino-Japanese rivalry and the signatories of the CPTPP are in a position to present a result in 2020 and this will be greater if they incorporate new signatories and present a common front to American protectionism. In North America, the likely scenario is the substitution of NAFTA for bilateral agreements. The new Korea-US FTA sets the standards for new US agreements: favorable quotas for sensitive US exports; quotas and, beyond them, high tariffs for US imports; interference in the definition of national economic policies: in Korea, monetary and public expenditure policies; in Mexico, wage and migration policies, as well as combat against drug trafficking.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Juan José Ramírez Bonilla, El Colegio de México

Procesos de integración económica en la región asiática del Pacífico. Desarrollo y Políticas Sociales en los países del Sudeste de Asi

References

Baker, P., & Swanson, A. (8 de marzo de 2018). Trump Authorizes Tariffs in Defiance of Allies at Home and Abroad. The New York Times. Recuperado de https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/08/us/politics/trump-tariff-announcement.html

Definiciones de términos fundamentales en la Colección de Tratados de las Naciones Unidas. (n.d.). En Naciones Unidas. Recuperado de http://www.un.org/es/treaty/untc.shtml

Escobar, R. (8 de marzo de 2018). TPP11: Chile firma el mayor tratado comercial en 25 años. Diario Concepción. Recuperado de https://www.diarioconcepcion.cl/economia-y-negocios/2018/03/08/tpp-11-chile-firma-hoy-el-mayor-tratado-comercial-en-25-anos.html

European Commission. (2012). Trade, growth and development. Tailoring trade and investment policy for those countries most in need. Bruselas: European Commission. doi: 10.2781/34879 Recuperado de http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2012/january/tradoc_148992.EN.pdf

Furche, C. (2013). Chile and the TPP negotiations: Analysis of the economic and political impact. Recuperado del sitio de Internet Derechos Digitales: https://www.derechosdigitales.org/wp-content/uploads/TPP-furche-EN.pdf

Holodny, E. (28 de abril de 2017). Trump says he’ll revisit the ‘horrible’ US-South Korea trade deal – here is what you need to know. Business Insider. Recuperado de http://www.businessinsider.com/what-is-korea-us-trade-deal-korus-2017-4

International Monetary Fund. (2017). Road Less Traveled: Growth in Emerging Market and Developing Economies in a Complicated External Environment. En International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook.Gaining Momentum? (65-199). Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund. Recuperado de https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2017/04/04/world-economic-outlook-april-2017

International Trade Center (ITC). (2018a). List of supllying markets for a product imported by United States of America, Product: 72 Iron and steel [Archivo de datos]. Recuperado de https://www.trademap.org/Country_SelProductCountry_TS.aspx?nvpm=1|842||||72|||2|1|1|1|2|1|2|1|1

International Trade Center (ITC). (2018b). List of supllying markets for a product imported by United States of America, Product: 76 Aluminium and articles thereof [Archivo de datos]. Recuperado de https://www.trademap.org/Country_SelProductCountry_TS.aspx?nvpm=1|842||||76|||2|1|1|1|2|1|2|1|1

International Trade Center (ITC). (2018c). TradeMap [Archivo de datos]. Recuperado de https://www.trademap.org/

Lanz, R., & Miroudot, S. (2011). Intra-Firm Trade: Patterns, Determinants and Policy Implications (OECD Trade Policy Papers. Informe No. 114). Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/5kg9p39lrwnn-en Recuperado de https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/trade/intra-firm-trade_5kg9p39lrwnn-en

Lee, W. K. (06 de marzo de 2018). Malaysia unlikely to implement CPTPP in early 2019, needs more time to table laws. the Sun daily. Recuperado de http://www.thesundaily.my/news/2018/03/06/malaysia-unlikely-implement-cptpp-early-2019-needs-more-time-table-laws

Lighthizer, R. E. (12 de julio de 2017). [Carta dirigida al Dr. Joo Hyunghwan, Ministro de Comercio, Industria y Energía]. Executive Office of the President, Office of the United States Trade Representative. Recuperado de https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Releases/USTR%20KORUS.pdf

Lotto, S. (5 de octubre de 2017). Trump scores first win on ‘horrible’ South Korea trade agreement. Newsweek. Recuperado de http://www.newsweek.com/trump-scores-first-win-horrible-south-korea-trade-agreement-678892

Mansfield, K. (21 de enero de 2017). Is this the end of TTIP? Trump REMOVES deal with the European Union from White House website. Express. Recuperado de https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/756970/donald-trump-ttip-eu-white-house

México firma el Tratado Integral y Progresista de Asociación Transpacífico (CPTPP). (8 de marzo de 2018). RASAInforma. Recuperado de http://rasa-informa.com/mexico-firma-el-tratado-integral-y-progresista-de-asociacion-transpacifico-cptpp/

México y Canadá deben estar listos para continuar con TLCAN sin EU: Guajardo. (15 de marzo de 2018). El Universal. Recuperado de http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/cartera/economia/mexico-y-canada-deben-estar-listos-para-continuar-con-tlcan-sin-eu-guajardo

Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade of New Zealand. (s.f.). CPTPP vs TPP. https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/trade/free-trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements-concluded-but-not-in-force/cptpp/tpp-and-cptpp-the-differences-explained/

Morales, R. (09 de marzo de 2018a). México y Canadá libran aranceles Trump… por ahora. El Economista. Recuperado de https://www.eleconomista.com.mx/empresas/Mexico-y-Canada-libran-aranceles-Trump...-por-ahora-20180309-0009.html

Morales, R. (23 de marzo de 2018b). Trump exenta a aliados de tarifas al acero. El Economista. Recuperado de https://www.eleconomista.com.mx/empresas/Trump-exenta-a-aliados-de-tarifas-al-acero-20180323-0034.html

Secretaría de Economía. (s.f.). Tratado Integral y Progresista de Asociación Transpacífico. Recuperado de https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/302220/Comprehensive-and-Progressive-Agreement-for-Trans-Pacific-Partnership-CPTPP-Spanish__002_.pdf

Solís, M. (24 de marzo de 2017). Trump withdrawing from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (Unpacked) Recuperado del sitio de Internet Brookings Institution: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/unpacked/2017/03/24/trump-withdrawing-from-the-trans-pacific-partnership/

Tankersley, J., & Kitroeff, N. (22 de marzo de 2018). U.S. Exempts Some Allies From Tariffs, but May Opt for Quotas. The New York Times. Recuperado de https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/22/business/us-eu-tariffs-steel-aluminum.html

United Nations (UN), Population Division. (2017a). World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision [Archivo de datos]. Recuperado de https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/world-population-prospects-the-2017-revision.html

United Nations (UN), Statistics Division. (2017b). National Account Main Aggregates Database, GDP and its breakdown at constant 2010 prices in US dollars [Archivo de datos]. Recuperado de https://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/dnllist.asp

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), Data Center. (2018). Foreign Direct Investment: Inward and Outward Flows and Stocks, 1970-2016 [Archivo de datos]. Recuperado de http://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=96740

United States Trade Representative Office. (2017a). United States, Korea to Hold Amendment Negotiations on KORUS FTA [Press Releases. December] Recuperado de https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2017/december/titleunited-states-korea-hold

United States Trade Representative Office. (2017b). USTR Announces Second Special Session of the US-Korea FTA Joint Committee [Press Releases. September] Recuperado de https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2017/september/ustr-announces-second-special

United States Trade Representative Office. (2018a). New US Trade Policy and National Security Outcomes with the Republic of Korea [Press Releases. March] Recuperado de https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/fact-sheets/2018/march/new-us-trade-policy-and-national

United States Trade Representative Office. (2018b). Statement on the Conclusion of the US-Korea (Korus) FTA Meetings in Seoul [Press Releases. January] Recuperado de https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/fact-sheets/2018/january/statement-conclusion-us-korea-korus-0

World Trade Organization. (2018). Regional Trade Arrangements Information System. [Archivo de datos]. Recuperado de http://rtais.wto.org/UI/PublicMaintainRTAHome.aspx

Published

2018-12-17