Comparative analysis on the speech act of petition in Chinese and Spanish

Authors

  • Xinghua Li University of Nankai

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32870/mycp.v11i33.797

Keywords:

Spanish, Chinese, verbal communication, intercultural communication, request speech acts

Abstract

In this study, we aim at analyzing differences and similarities of the general characteristics existing in the production of speech acts of petition between Chinese and Spanish languages. The following results are obtained: 1) When we issue the petition in Chinese, the weakening language behavior can be achieved through internal and external modifications; however, in Spanish the weakening language behavior is achieved through the use of conventionally indirect strategies. 2) In Spanish, since neither the internal modifications or external modifications nor the opening markers are used in this language, the speech acts of petition are relatively simple. 3) In intercultural communication, communication clashes occur more frequently in the cases of internal modifications, in the support movement and in the aleters, because more differences are observed in those aspects, which lead to negative transfer.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Álvarez, A. I. (2005). Hablar en español. Ediciones Nobel.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Clarendon Press.

Binti I. R. (2013). Análisis contrastivo de la cortesía verbal en Español y Malayo en la realización de tres actos de habla; petición, mandato y rechazo [Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Valladolid].

Blum-Kulka, S. & House, J. (1989). “Cross-cultural and situational variation in requesting behavior”. En Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. y Kasper, G. (Eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics: requests and apologies. Ablex Publishing Corporation, 123-154.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness. Some universals in language usage.

Cambridge University Press.

Cao, Y. ?? (2013). ?? [La Tempestad].?????? [?People’s Literature Publishing House].

Cela, C. J. (2001). La colmena. Cátedra.

Díaz P. F. J. (2001). La cortesía verbal en inglés y en español: actos de habla y pragmática intercultural. Universidad de Jaén.

Dueñas, M. (2010). El tiempo entre costuras. Temas de hoy.

Escandel, V. M. V. (2013). Introducción a la pragmática. Ariel.

Goddard, C., & Wierzbicka, A. (1997). “Discourse and culture”, en Teun A. van Dijk, T.A. (Ed.), Discourse studies: a multidisciplinary introduction. London: Thousand Oaks, Calif., Sage Publications, 231-257.

Gu, Y. (1990). “Politeness in modern Chinese”. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 237- 257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ip-2018-0024

Hong, W. (1993). A cross cultural study of request in Chinese and German.

Dissertation Abstract International, 54(07).

Lao S. ?? (2003). ?? [La casa de té].??????? [People’s Literature Pu- blishing].

Lao S. ?? (2010). ???? [El camello Xiangzi]. ????? [Nanhai Publishing House].

Li, X. (2016). Aspectos contrastivos de los actos de habla de petición en chino y en español. [Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Valladolid].

Mo, Y. ??(2012a). ?????? [Las baladas del ajo]. ????? [Writers Publishing House].

Mo, Y. ?? (2012b). ???? [Grandes pechos, amplias caderas]. ????? [Writers Publishing House].

Pérez, G. B. (1992). Fortunata y Jacinta: dos historias de casadas. Cátedra. Qian, Z. ??? (2013). ?? [La fortaleza asediada]. ??????? [People’s Literature Publishing House].

Rue, Y. J., & Zhang, G. Q. (2008). Request Strategies: A Comparative Study in Mandarin Chinese and Korean. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Sánchez, F. R. (2006). El Jarama. Espasa.

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speect acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.

Wierzbicka, A. (2003). Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human inte- raction. Mouton de Gruyter.

Yu, H. ?? (2010). ?? [¡Vivir!]. ??????? [People’s Literature Publishing House].

Published

2022-08-31 — Updated on 2022-12-16

Versions

How to Cite

Li, X. (2022). Comparative analysis on the speech act of petition in Chinese and Spanish. México Y La Cuenca Del Pacífico, 11(33), 151-176. https://doi.org/10.32870/mycp.v11i33.797 (Original work published August 31, 2022)