Discussion on the Visual Perception of Chinese Characters Based on Neurocognitive Linguistics

Palabras clave: Neurocognitive Linguistics, Relational Network Theory, Meaningful Learning Theory, components of Chinese characters, characteme

Resumen

This article will study the cognitive nature of Chinese characters and the neurocognitive basis of the visual perception of Chinese characters in Chinese learning through the dismantling of Chinese character components, adopted into the “Relational Network Theory” (rnt) proposed by Sydney Lamb. We will also discuss the neurocognitive basis of zìgǎn, 字感 (Bai & Liu, 2006), Grapho-Morphological Awareness of Chinese characters, an abstract concept entangled in the Chinese Character Teaching (cct), and some of the concepts included in Ausubel’ Meaningful Learning Theory, to ground a teaching methodology of the cct in the Chinese International Teaching (cit).

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Citas

Ausubel, D., Novak & Hanesian. (1983). Psicología Educativa: Un punto de vista cognoscitivo. (2 ed.). México: Trillas.

Bai, J. B. & Liu, Y. N. (2006). 试论非汉字文化圈学生的字感培养与获得 [The acquisition and cultivation of students’ zìgǎn outside the circle of Chinese culture].语言教学研究 [Journal Study of Language], 5, 104-105.

Chen, H. (2015). ¿Ideogramas o pictogramas? Una introducción a los caracte- res chinos. México y la Cuenca del Pacífico, 4(10), 107-129. doi: 10.32870/ mycp.v4i10.479

Chen, H. (2017a). La metáfora y los caracteres chinos, México y la Cuenca del Pacífico, 6(16), 143-165. doi: 10.32870/mycp.v6i16.539

Chen, H. (2017b). Enseñanza de los caracteres chinos a los estudiantes hispa- nohablantes: desde una perspectiva de la ciencia cognitiva (Tesis doctoral). Universidad de Complutense, Madrid, España.

Chen, H. (2018). Crisis de los caracteres chinos. Círculo De Lingüística Aplicada a La Comunicación, 74, 29-44. doi: 10.5209/CLAC.60512

Cheng, Q. L. (2001). 认知语言学概论 [Introduction to Neurocognitive Linguistics]. Beijing, China: 外语教学与研究出版 [Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press].

Cheng Q. L. (2002). 逼近语言系统 [Approach to the Linguistic System. Nanjing]. 东南大学出版社[China: Southeast University Press].

Cheng, Q. L. (2005). 神经认知语言学引论 [An Invitation to Neurocognitive Linguistics]. 外文出版社 [Beijing, China: Foreign Languages Press].

Cheng, Q. L. (2006). 概念框架和认知 [Conceptual Frame and Cognition]. 上 海外语教学出版社[Shanghai, China: Shanghai Foreign Language Edu- cation Press].

Cheng, Q. L. (2011). 概念语义研究的新视角 [A New Approach to Conceptual Semantics]. 外语教学与研究出版社 [Beijing, China: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press].

García, A. M. (2007). Methodological Tenets, Plausibility and Reality in Chomskyan Biolinguistics. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 3(3), 303- 324. doi: 10.1558/lhs.v3i3.303

García, A. M. (2012). La Teoría de Redes Relacionales: correlatos neurológicos de un modelo lingüístico conexionista. Onomázein, 26(2), 221-257.

García, A. M. (2015). A connectionist approach to functional-cognitive linguistics: Spanish pronominal clitics and verb endings in relational network terms. Revista Signos. Estudios de lingüística, 48(88), 197-222. doi: 10.4067/S0718-09342015000200003

García, A. M. & Gil, J. M. (2011). A historical survey into the origins of Lam- bian linguistics. LACUS Forum, 36, 111-123.

Gil, J. M. (2009). Neurología y lingüística: la “teoría de redes relacionales” como una alternativa ante Chomsky. Revista de Investigación Lingüística, 12, 343-374.

Gu, Z. X. (2013). 格式塔心理学理论指导下的整字教学 [Enseñanza de los caracteres enteros dirigida por la teoría psicológica de la Gestalt]. Yangzhou, China: Universidad de Yangzhou.

Jackendoff, R. (2009). Conceptual semantics and cognitive linguistics. Cog nitive Linguistics, 7(1), 93-129. doi:10.1515/cogl.1996.7.1.93

Lamb, S. (1999). Pathways of the brain: The neurocognitive basis of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Lamb, S. (2004). Language and Reality. London: Continuum Books.

Lamb, S. (2011). Senderos del cerebro: la base neurolingüística del lenguaje. (Trad. Gil, J. M. & García, A. M.). Mar del Plata, Argentina: EUDEM.

Lamb, S. (2016). Linguistic structure: A plausible theory. Language Under Discussion, 4(1), 1-37.

Liu, Y. H. (2007). 语言的神经基础 [Neurobasis of Language]. 中国社会科学出版社 [China social sciences press].

Marcos, N. (2010). Grapho-morphological awareness in Spanish L2 reading. (Master´s thesis). Pittsburgh University, Pittsburgh.

Sánchez, C. H. (2013). Priming morfológico y conciencia morfológica: Una investi gación con estudiantes norteamericanos de E/LE (Tesis doctoral). Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, España.

WU, L. W. (2014). A reconsideration of 2,905 Chinese characters’ component disassembly in the Chinese characters of HSK Graded Outline, TFM. China: Guangxi University.

Xie, G. H. (2000). 汉字字源字典 [Etymological Dictionary of Chinese Characters]. Beijing, China: Peking University.

Xu, S. (1963). 说文解字 [Shuowenjiezi]. 中华书局[Beijing: Book Company Zhonghua].

Yang, Y.M. (2007). 语言的理论假设与神经基础——以当前汉语的若干 神经语言学研究为例 [Theoretical Hypotheses on Language and Their Neurological Basis]. 语言科学 [Linguistic Science], 6(2), 60-83.

Zhou, P. (2016). 认知神经语言学方法论模型的建构 [A Methodological Model for Cognitive Neurolinguistics]. 外国语 [Journal of Foreign Lan guages], 39(2), 39-47.

Publicado
2019-12-19
Sección
Análisis